How we rate sportsbooks and prediction markets
Every rating on OddsGrab is built from the same transparent scoring system. Here is exactly what we measure, how each criterion is weighted, and the line we hold on independence.
Rating methodology
We score every sportsbook and prediction-market platform against eight criteria. Each one is scored on the same five-point scale and carries a fixed weight, so two reviews are always comparable and no single review is graded on a curve. Where we can measure something directly — pricing, above all — the score comes from data, not impressions.
Pricing competitiveness
30% weightHow often a platform posts the best available price across the markets we track (its best-price rate), and its average hold, or vig. Both figures come straight from OddsGrab’s own line-by-line comparison data — so a strong score reflects measurably better numbers, not reputation.
Market breadth
15% weightThe range of sports, leagues, and bet types — moneylines, spreads, totals, props, futures, and same-game parlays. For prediction markets, the breadth of tradeable questions and the liquidity standing behind them.
App and UX quality
12% weightMobile app speed, navigation, bet-slip clarity, and live-betting responsiveness — how quickly you can find and place a wager. Friction costs you the line.
Promotions quality and fairness
10% weightOffers scored on real value, not headline size: realistic wagering requirements, one-tap opt-in, fair expiry windows, and transparent terms. A “$1,000 bonus” behind a steep rollover scores below a clean first-bet offer.
Banking options
10% weightDeposit and withdrawal methods, processing times, and minimums. Fast, free, low-minimum payouts score highest; slow or fee-laden withdrawals score lower.
Customer support
8% weightAvailable channels — live chat, phone, email — typical response time, and the quality of the answer when something actually goes wrong.
State availability
8% weightThe number of legal US states a sportsbook operates in. Broader availability means more readers can act on the rating where they live.
Responsible gambling tools
7% weightDeposit, time, and wager limits, cool-off periods, and self-exclusion — and how easy these tools are to find and use. We weight ease of access, not just presence.
The scoring system
Each criterion is scored from 1 to 5. The overall rating is the weighted average of all eight scores — using the weights above — rounded to one decimal place. Pricing carries the most weight because the best available number is the most reliable edge any bettor has; responsible-gambling tools and support round out the score so a book can’t buy its way to the top on promos alone.
Where a live figure exists — such as a book’s best-price rate from our comparison data — that score is computed directly. Where a measure isn’t yet wired into live data, we use a documented editorial baseline and label the rating as illustrative until the feed is connected. We never present an estimate as a measurement.
Editorial independence
OddsGrab earns commissions when readers sign up with a platform through our links. Those commercial relationships never influence a rating, a ranking, or which price we highlight. The best price is the best price, regardless of whether the book pays us a referral fee — and our comparison tools surface it on the merits, every time.
Affiliate terms and editorial scoring are kept strictly separate. No operator can pay for a higher rating, a better placement, or a more favourable review, and we will rate a non-partner above a partner whenever the data says so. Every page that contains affiliate links discloses it plainly.
How often we update
We re-check every review at least once per quarter, and immediately when something material changes — a new welcome offer, a state launch, an app overhaul, or a clear shift in pricing. Every review page carries its own “Last verified” date so you can see exactly how current it is before you act on it.
Content standards
Reviews and guides are written and maintained by the OddsGrab editorial team and held to a single bar: a reader should be able to act on what we publish without second-guessing it. We write in plain English, explain the trade-offs rather than hide them, and avoid marketing language that we wouldn’t stand behind.
Fact-checking
Anything that can be measured is pulled from our own comparison data or from the operator’s published terms — not from memory or marketing copy. Promo terms, banking details, and legal availability are checked against primary sources before they go live, and re-checked on the quarterly cadence above.
Data sources and attribution
Odds and contract prices come from the sportsbooks and prediction markets we compare. Legal-status and licensing details come from state regulators and the operators’ own disclosures. We cite primary sources where we reference them, date anything time-sensitive, and never present another site’s figures as our own.
Corrections
When we get something wrong, we fix it as soon as we can and update the “Last verified” date. Odds and prices move fast, so always confirm the current number on the operator’s site before placing a wager.